Exploring the Deeper Layers of Change: The Future of Aid 2040 through Causal Layered Analysis
The humanitarian and development ecosystem is undergoing profound transformation, shaped by overlapping crises, accelerating climate instability, technological disruption, demographic shifts, and the reconfiguration of global power structures. Yet beneath these visible dynamics lie deeper, often invisible layers of meaning that determine how the future of aid will unfold. The Future of Aid 2040 – Causal Layered Analysis (CLA) Report explores these foundational dimensions by applying Sohail Inayatullah’s CLA methodology to the humanitarian and development sector. Rather than limiting itself to surface-level trends or institutional reforms, it digs into the cultural, psychological, and mythic structures that sustain the current aid paradigm. Through this lens, the report reveals how dominant worldviews, centred on control, external expertise, and a “giver–receiver” dynamic, continue to shape global responses to crisis, even as these worldviews increasingly clash with emerging values of equity, justice, and local agency. By unpacking these layers of discourse, the study illuminates how aid is not only an operational system but also a narrative system: one that tells a story about who we are, who needs help, and who provides it.
The CLA approach exposes the limits of treating humanitarian challenges purely as logistical or technical problems. Instead, it invites a shift from problem-solving to meaning-making, from efficiency to transformation. It shows that real systemic change requires transforming the metaphors and moral foundations that underlie aid practice: moving from charity to solidarity, from intervention to partnership, and from short-term relief to shared resilience. In doing so, the report provides a new intellectual and methodological bridge between foresight, systems thinking, and ethics. It complements the broader Future of Aid 2040 foresight series by offering the conceptual depth needed to understand why and how transformation must occur. Ultimately, this report is both a mirror and a provocation: a mirror reflecting the unspoken assumptions that structure the humanitarian imagination, and a provocation challenging practitioners, policymakers, and researchers to reimagine the narratives guiding their work. By surfacing the deep stories that underpin the aid system, it opens space for a more reflexive, adaptive, and locally grounded humanitarian future—one in which power, knowledge, and empathy are shared rather than imposed.